SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(SC) 549

1997(3) Supreme 465
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
K. Ramaswamy and K.T. Thomas, JJ.
State Fishery Officers Association, West Bengal & Anr. -Petitioners
versus
State of West Bengal & Anr. -Respondents
Special Leave Petition (C) No. 5388 of 1997
Decided on 21-3-1997
Counsel for the Parties :
For the Petitioners : B.K. Satija, S. Bhowmick and Ms. Sarla Chandra, Advocates.

IMPORTANT POINT
No direction can be given to the Government to grant monetary benefits contrary to its policy which falls within the realm of the executive policy decision.

Headnote:SERVICE LAW-Service conditions of employees-No direction can be given to the Government to grant monetary benefits contrary to its policy which falls within the realm of executive policy decision. (Para 2)

       

ORDER

This special leave petition arises from the order of the Administrative Tribunal, Calcutta, made on December 12, 1996 in Case No. TA-268/96. The petitioners had a dialogue with the Government of West Bengal to revise the service conditions of the employees in the Fishery Department, namely, Assistant Fishery Officers, Fishery Extension Officers etc. w.e.f. April 1, 1961. There was an agreement reached between the Government and the Union of the first petitioner. Subsequently, the Government have issued orders giving all the benefits except the monetary benefits from April 1, 1961 to April 1, 1981 prospectively. The petitioners have filed the petition in the Tribunal seeking direction for payment of arrears on the premise that it was a tripartite agreement and, therefore, the Government is bound by the undertaking given in the agreement. The Tribunal has perused the record and stated thus :

"It appears from the documents on record that the Finance Department was/a party/not to such decisions. Nor does it appear that subsequently concurrence of the Finance Department was obtained in this connection. Besides, it does not appear that the decision were translated into any formal Government order. Be that as it may, it will not proper to grant such financial benefits in favour of Assistant Fishery Officers, Fishery Extension Officers, etc. with effect from 1.4.1961 while other actions of the Government were to take effect only from 1.4.1981."

2. In view of the above finding and in view of the policy decision taken by the Government, it cannot be said that the decision of the Government is arbitrary. No direction can be given to the Government to grant the monetary benefits contrary to its policy which falls within the realm of the executive policy decision.

The special leave petition is accordingly dismissed.

Petition dismissed.

********

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top