FAIZAN UDDIN, S.B.MAJMUDAR, K.T.THOMAS, K.RAMASWAMY, S.P.BHARUCHA
Secretary To Government – Appellant
Versus
K. Munniappan – Respondent
ORDER
Delay condoned.
2. Leave granted. We have heard learned counsel on both sides.
3. This appeal by special leave arises from the order of the Tamil Nadu Administrative Tribunal, made on June 25, 1996 in OA No. 6457/95.
4. The respondent, before being superannuated, was served with a suspension order which reads as under :
"Whereas an enquiry into grave criminal offence against Thiru K. Muniappan. Divisional Engineer (National Highways), Salem now at Paramkudi Highways and Rural Works Division is contemplated."
5. The respondent challenged the said order in the Tribunal. The Tribunal in the impugned order has stated that Rule 17 of the Tamil Nadu Civil Services (CCA) Rules does not empower the appellant to suspend the respondent pending such an enquiry and, therefore, the action taken was illegal. The question is: whether the view taken by the Tribunal is correct in law? Rule 17(e)(1) reads as under :
"(e)(1) A member of a Service may be placed under suspension from service, where
(i) an enquiry into grave charge against him is contemplated, or is pending; or
(ii) a complaint against him of any criminal offence is under investigation of trial and if
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.