SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(SC) 638

1997(4) Supreme 173
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
S.C. Agrawal and Mrs. Sujata V. Manohar, JJ.
M/s. Madras Industrial Investment Corporation Ltd. -Appellant
versus
Commissioner of Income-Tax, Tamil Nadu-I, Madras -Respondent
Civil Appeal No. 3531 of 1982
Decided on 4-4-1997
Counsel for the Parties :
For the Appellant : Ms. Janki Ramachandran, Advocate.
For the Respondent : Dr. V. Gaurishankar, Sr. Adv., and Ms. Lakshmi Iyengar, Advocate.

Headnote:TAXATION-Income Tax Act, 1961-Section 37-Expenditure-Scope and meaning-It also covers liability which assessee has incurred in presenti although payable in futuro-A contingent liability that may arise in future-Not expenditure -It would also cover not just a one time payment but a liability spread out over a number of years-Public issue of debentures issued at discount-Whether discount on debentures is expenditure incurred by company for purposes of its business ?-(Yes)-This liability incurred is being written off over period of 12 years-It can be treated as expenditure.

       Held : The liability, however, to pay the discounted amount over the above the amount received for the debentures, is a liability which has been incurred by the company for the purposes of its business in order to generate funds for its business activities. The amounts so obtained by issue of debentures are used by the company for the purposes of its business. This would, therefore, be expenditure. (Para 11)

       The appellant, therefore, had, in its return, correctly claimed a deduction only in respect of the proportionate part of discount of Rs. 12,500/- over the relevant accounting period in question. (Para 16)

       The appellant is, therefore, entitled to deduct a sum of Rs. 12,500/- out of the discount of Rs. 3,0,000/- in the relevant assessment year. The balance expenditure of Rs. 2,87,500/- cannot be deducted in the assessment year in question. (Para 17)

       

JUDGMENT

Mrs. Sujata V. Manohar, J.-The appellant is a public limited company. The present appeal filed by it pertains to the accounting year ending June 30, 1967 relevant to the assessment year 1968-69.

2. On December 10, 1966 a public issue of the debentures of the appellant-company was made. The total value of the debentures was Rs. 1.5 crores repayable with interest at the rate of 5-3/4% per annum. The debentures were issued at a discount of 2%, redeemable after 12 years. The issue price of a debenture of Rs. 100/- was Rs. 98/-. The total discount on the issue of Rs. 1.5 crores amounted to Rs. 3 lakhs. For the assessment year 1968-69 the appellant-company wrote off Rs. 12,500/- out of the total discount of Rs. 3 lakhs being the proportionate amount of discount for the period of six months ending with June 30, 1967, taking into account the period of 12 years which was the period of redemption and dividing the discount of Rs. 3 lakhs over the period of 12 years.

3. Earlier the appellant had issued debentures at a discount of 1% redeemable after 10 years. The discount relating to these debentures was being written off periodically. For the assessment year 1968-69 the appellant-company wrote off a discount of Rs. 10,000/-. Thus, in the balance-sheet as of 30th of June, 1967, on the Liabilities side the debentures issued during the relevant accounting year were shown at the figure of Rs. 1.50 crores. On the Assets side, the discount account of these debentures was as follows :-

"Discount allowed on issue of Bonds

(to the extent not written off)

Upto last balance sheet Rs. 22,500

Additions during the year Rs. 3,00,000

Rs. 3,22,500

Less :

Amount written of Rs. 22,500

Rs. 3,00,000

The discount of Rs. 22,500/- represented Rs. 12,500/- written off out of the discount of Rs. 3,00,000/- and Rs. 10,000/- written off as discount on the previous issue.

4. The Income-tax officer by his assessment order dated January 31, 1969 disallowed the claim of the appellant for deduction of Rs. 22,500/- on the ground that discount on bonds and debentures was not allowable as an expenditure. On appeal, the Appellate Assistant Commissioner by his order dated July 4, 1969 held that the discount allowed at the time of the issue of debentures was to be treated as a part of the expenditure for such issue. He upheld the claim for deduction of Rs. 12,500/- but rejected the claim as regards Rs. 10,000/- on the ground that it related to discount on debentures issued in an earlier year and hence it did not pertain to the relevant previous year.

5. The assessee then preferred an appeal before the Appellate Tribunal. The assessee contended, inter alia, that (1) The Appellate Assistant Commissioner had erred in sustaining the disallowance of Rs. 10,000/- on the ground that it related to an earlier year and (2) The Appellate Assistant Commissioner having held that discount allowed at the time of issue of debentures was to be treated as part of the expenditure incurred for such issue, should have further allowed a sum of Rs. 2,87,000/- being balance amount of the total discount of Rs. 3,00,000/- relating to the issue of debentures of Rs. 1.5 crores. Before the Tribunal the department contended that the appellant-company had, for the first time, made a new claim before the Tribunal for deduction of Rs. 2,87,500/- and the Tribunal had no jurisdiction to examine this claim. This objection was rejected by the Tribunal. The Tribunal held that the expenditure of Rs. 3,00,000/- was incurred during the relevant previous year although it was proportionately written off over a period of 12 years. The expenditure of Rs. 3,00,000/- was allowable as expenditure incurred for the purpose of business. But the mere fact that for accountancy purposes this amount was spread over 12 years and only Rs. 12,500/- was written off, being the proportionate amount for 6 months ending with June 30, 1967, cannot make any difference. Therefore
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top