SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(SC) 703

D.P.WADHWA, K.RAMASWAMY
Laxmikant – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent


ORDER

Leave granted. We have heard counsel on both sides.

2. This appeal, by special leave, arises from the judgment passed by the Madhya Pradesh High Court at Jabalpur Bench, on November 23, 1995.

3. The appellant is a manufacturer of tooth paste, using tobacco as one of the ingredients therein. The Government exercising the power under Section 33-DDE of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 (for short, the "Act") issued notification as under :

"MINISTRY OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE

(Department of Health)

NOTIFICATION

New Delhi, the 30th April, 1992.

GSR-443(E).-Whereas, the Central Government is satisfied on the basis of evidence and other material before it that the use of tobacco in tooth-pastes/tooth-powders is likely to involve risk to human beings and that is necessary and expedient in the public interest so to do;

Now, therefore, in exercise of powers conferred by Section 33(EED) of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 (23 of 1949, the Central Government hereby prohibit the manufacture and sale of all Ayurvedic Drugs licensed as tooth-pastes/tooth-powders containing tobacco.

(No. X. 11014/3/91-DM-S & PFA)

H.S. Lamba, Jt. Secy."

Calling that notification in question, the appellant filed a wri













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top