SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(SC) 1690

SUHAS C.SEN, B.P.JEEVAN REDDY
H. M. M. LTD. – Appellant
Versus
Collector Of Central Excise, New Delhi – Respondent


JUDGMENT

B.P. Jeevan Reddy, J.-This appeal preferred against the judgment of the Cegat involves the interpretation of Notification No. 210 of 1979-CE dated 4.6.1979, issued by the Central Government under Rule 8 of the Central Excise Rules.

2. The appellant-assessee is engaged in the manufacture, inter alia, of "Horlicks" falling under Tariff Item 1-B of the Schedule to the Central Excises and Salt Act. It has a factory at Rajahmundry (Bommur) for manufacturing "Horlicks". The entire stock of Horlicks manufactured at Rajahmundry is, however, not cleared/removed after paying the duty at Rajahmundry, Only a portion of the production is put in unit containers/packages and cleared at Rajahmundry after paying the duty while the bulk of the production is sent to the appellant s factories situated at different places in India in bulk containers. There, the Horlicks is put in unit containers/packages and cleared after paying the duty.

3. For the purpose of manufacturing Horlicks, the appellant purchases barley malt which was dutiable under Tariff Items 68.

4. On June 4, 1979, the Central Government issued the aforesaid notification (No. 201 of 1979) exempting "all excisable goods ...... on whi

















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top