SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(SC) 810

D.P.WADHWA, K.RAMASWAMY
Tata Engineering And Locomotive Company LTD. – Appellant
Versus
Gajanan Y. Mandrekar – Respondent


ORDER

Leave granted. We have heard the Counsel on both sides.

2. The appeal by special leave arises from the Order, made on September 23, 1996 passed by the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission in F.A. No. 784/94.

3. The respondent had booked commercial vehicle, more commonly known as a Tipper Truck with registration No. SK 1210/B/36 on May 7, 1991. He purchased the vehicle after securing loans from a nationalised Bank on usual commercial rate of interest. After running the vehicle as driver-cum-owner for 9000 kms., it was found that the tyres were worn out completely, front axil pins of the vehicle were not fixed properly; at a speed of 40 kms. per hour the vibration of the vehicle (empty) was very high as the cabin was completely loose etc. He mentioned these defects in his letter dated March 10, 1992, after eight months. Subsequently, he reiterated the same in his different letters addressed to the agent, through whom he had purchased the vehicle. Finally, by letter dated May 2, 1992, after intimating that in spite of running the vehicle for 18000 to 18500 kms., despite repairs, the vehicle continue to give the same trouble. In spite of the warranty of service, the tr




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top