SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(SC) 2015

SUHAS C.SEN, B.P.JEEVAN REDDY
Marshall Sons And Company India LTD. – Appellant
Versus
Income Tax Officer – Respondent


JUDGMENT

B.P. Jeevan Reddy, J.-These appeals are preferred by Marshall Sons and Company (India) Limited (hereinafter referred to as the "Holding Company") as successors to Marshall Sons and Company (Manufacturing) Limited (hereinafter referred to as the "Subsidiary Company") against the judgment and order of the Madras High Court dismissing the writ petitions filed by them. The matter arises under the Income Tax Act.

2. The Holding Company had its registered office at 33-A, Chowranghee Road, Calcutta while the Subsidiary Company had its registered office at Madras. For the purposes of assessment under the Income Tax Act, while the accounting year of the Holding Company was the year ending on 30th June, the accounting year of the Subsidiary Company was the calender year. On Ist December, 1982, two letters were addressed by the Subsidiary Company to the Income Tax Officer stating that the company is desirous of effecting a change in the accounting year. They stated that they would wish to close their accounts of June 30, 1983 for the eighteen months period (January 1, 1982 to June 30, 1983) instead of closing the accounts on December 31, 1982. It was also stated that since the account





























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top