A.S.ANAND, S.B.MAJMUDAR
Bengal Waterproof LTD. – Appellant
Versus
Bombay Waterproof Manufacturing Company – Respondent
JUDGMENT
S.B. Majmudar, J.-Leave granted.
2. By consent of learned advocates of parties the appeal arising from the Special Leave Petition was finally heard and is being disposed of by this judgment. A short question arises for our consideration in this appeal. It is to the effect as to whether the suit filed by the appellant against the respondents in the Court of Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad being Original Suit No. 123 of 1982 was barred by the provisions of Order 2 Rule 2 Sub-rule (1) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 ( CPC for short). The Trial Court held that the suit was barred by the aforesaid provisions. We will refer to the appellant as plaintiff and the respondents as defendants for the sake of convenience in latter part of this judgment. A learned Single Judge of the High Court of Andhra Pradesh held on merits that the plaintiff had established its case of passing off against the defendants. However the decree of dismissal of the suit as passed by the trial Court of the ground that the suit was barred by Order 2 Rule 2 Sub-rule (3) was confirmed by the learned Single Judge. As no writ appeal lies against the said order before the Division Bench of the Hig
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.