SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(SC) 863

K.RAMASWAMY, D.P.WADHWA
Victoria – Appellant
Versus
K. V. Naik – Respondent


ORDER

This special leave petition arises from the Order of the High Court of Kerala, made on 17.3.1997 in CRP No. 2587/96.

2. The respondents-mortgagors had filed O.S. No. 285/79 for redemption of the mortgage. The petitioner-mortgagee claimed fixity of the tenure in respect of the entire extent of the land under Section 4(1)(1)(b) and Section 13 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act; in the alternative, she claimed to be entitled to deemed Kudikidappu rights over 3 cents of the total extent of 8 cents, by operation of Explanation IV to Section 2(25) of the Act. The trial Court negatived the contention by decree dated July 30, 1980. Final decree was passed on September 31, 1992. The Court found that in a suit for redemption of mortgage, claim of Kudikidappu advanced by the petitioner arises for consideration only at the time of the execution; thus, in this case, prima facie, they are not entitled to reference under Section 125(3) of the Act. When the petitioner had carried the matter to the High Court, the High Court held that it operates as constructive res judicata. Since that question was raised at the time when the final decree had been passed, the petitioner raised this point in the ex









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top