SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(SC) 750

D.P.WADHWA, K.RAMASWAMY
Ram Rati – Appellant
Versus
Saroj Devi – Respondent


ORDER

Leave granted.

We have heard the counsel on both sides.

2. This appeal, by special leave, arises from the judgment of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh at Jabalpur Bench, passed on October 30, 1996, in W.P. No.632/95.

3. Elections to the post of Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat, Laua Kothar Block, Raipur Distt. Rewa were held on May 30, 1994. 223 votes were polled in favour of the appellant while the respondent was polled 207 votes. In Form No.26-B, Ex. P2, the Returning Officer had declared that the elections to the office of Sarpanch of the Gram Panchayat were held and the appellant, Smt. Ram Rati, R/o Village Loua Kothar, Raipur Kurchulian, Rewa Distt., M.P., who was a candidate in the said election, was duly elected. The said certificate of the Returning Officer is dated June 1, 1994. The respondent, feeling aggrieved filed an Election Petition. In the said petition, the respondent stated that the election was not properly conducted; an application for recounting was made but it was not done; evidence was adduced in support thereof. The Tribunal directed recounting, which has been affirmed by the High Court. Thus this appeal, by special leave.

4. The question is: whether the responde











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top