SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(SC) 891

1997(7) Supreme 146
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
K. Ramaswamy & D.P. Wadhwa, JJ.
Shri Irshad Ali & Ors. -Appellants
versus
Hazi Abdul Sukhur Mozumdar & Ors. -Respondents
Civil Appeal Nos. 4460 & 4461 of 1997
(Arising out of SLP (C) No. 23118-19 of 1996)
Decided on 7-7-1997
Counsel for the Parties :
For the Appellants : Shakeel Ahmed Syed, Advocate.
For the Respondents : Vijay Hansaria, Ms. Smita Shankar, & S.K. Jain, Advocates.

Headnote:Land Acquisition Act, 1894-Section 54-Against award of reference Court only respondent No. 1 who had 1/3rd share in acquired land filed appeal-High Court enhanced compensation-Appellants who had 1/3rd share sought review which was dismissed by High Court-Appeal-Since appellants had not challenged award of reference Court and It became final to of their share, they were not entitled to higher compensation.(Para 3)

       

ORDER

Leave granted. We have heard learned counsel for both the parties.

2. This appeal arises against the judgment and order dated July 12, 1996 in Review Application No. 1 of 1995 and the main judgment dated October 8, 1993 in First Appeal No. 8 of 1989.

3. The admitted position is that the appellant is entitled to 1/3rd share of the acquired land. The total extend of the land acquired is 10 Bighas, 15 Khatas, 2 chattaks and 5 gondas. The Land Acquisition Officer awarded compensation against which the parties sought reference for re-determination of compensation etc. under Section 18 of the Land acquisition Act. The Reference Court by its award dated September 7, 1988 enhanced the compensation. The awarded compensation. To the extent of the claim of the respondent No.1, namely, 3 bighas, 16 kathas, 1 chatak, namely 1/3rd of the entire land, he filed an appeal under Section 54 of the Land Acquisition Act. The High Court enhanced the compensation. Thereafter, the appellant filed his application under Order 47, Rule 1, CPC for review of the order. After reconsidering the matter and the main order, the High Court dismissed the same. Thus, this appeal by special leave. In view of the fact that the total extent of the land is 10 Bighas, 15 kathas, 2 chattaks, 2 gandas, as referred earlier, in which admittedly respondent No.1 is having 1/3rd share, the first respondent had waived his claim for higher compensation for the above extent of the land. Since the appellants had not challenged the award of the reference Court and the award has become final to the extent of their share, they are entitled to any higher compensation for the extent of 1/3rd share.

4. The appeals are therefore, dismissed. No costs.

Appeal allowed.

********

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top