SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(SC) 1092

K.VENKATASWAMI, V.N.KHARE
Government Of T. N. – Appellant
Versus
K. N. Ramamurthy – Respondent


JUDGMENT

K. Venkataswami, J.-The respondent herein was working as a Deputy Commercial Tax Officer, Cuddalore (Town) at the relevant time. Under Rule 17(b) Tamil Nadu Civil Services (Classification, Control & Appeals) Rules, the following charges were framed against the respondent :

(i) That he failed to analyse the facts involved in each and every case referred to above;

(ii) that he failed to check the accounts deeply and thoroughly while making final assessment;

(iii) that he failed to subject the above turnover to tax originally; and

(iv) That he failed to safeguard the Government revenue to a huge extent of Rs. 44,850/-.

2. After a due and proper enquiry, it was found that the charges were proved. Accordingly, a punishment of stoppage of increment for three years with cumulative effect was imposed.

3. The respondent challenged the above-said punishment by filing O.A. No. 1400/90 before the Tamil Nadu Administrative Tribunal. This Tribunal vide its order dated April 9, 1992, set aside the said punishment holding as follows :-

"As laid down in the decision of the Madras High Court, the hierarchy of authorities is cons



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top