SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(SC) 1015

K.VENKATASWAMI, M.M.PUNCHHI
Rajesh Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Institute Of Engineers (India) – Respondent


ORDER

Leave granted

2. The two appellants, Rajesh Kumar and Harbir Singh appeared in the AIME Group B examination conducted by the respondent-Institute of Engineers (India) On June 1, 1990. Their Centre was at Tagore School, Karnal. No case of copying or any malpractice was ever noticed or reported by the supervisory staff attending the examination. somewhere in October 1990, the two appellants along with 11 other examinees received identical notices from the respondent-Institute seeking their explanation on the allegations of copying and malpractices mentioned therein. The contents of the notice were that the examiner evaluating the answer books of the examinees had reported that 13 examinees bad resorted to copying in as much as their answers to some of the questions in the examination were exactly the same and that on that basis it was thought that the examinees had adopted unfair means. The two appellants submitted their replies to the allegations stating that similarity in the answer books could be as a result of the preparation from the same text books as available in the market and that the question of copying could not arise as would be evident from the sitting plan of the












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top