1997(8) Supreme 299
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Sujata V. Manohar & M. Jagannadha Rao, JJ.
H.S. Grewal etc. -Petitioners
versus
Union of India and Ors. -Respondents
Transferred Case (C) No. 2 of 1996
With
T.C. (C) No. 3/96, SLP (C) No. 7076/95, T.C. (C) Nos. 9-13/96, T.C. (C) No. 41/96 & W.P. (C) No. 98/97
Decided on 28-8-1997
Counsel for the Parties :
For the Appearing Parties : Gopal Subramanium, Jitendra Sharma, A.K. Ganguli, Mrs. Shyamala Pappu, Vasudev Prasad, P.P. Malhotra, Sr. Advocates, (Santosh Kumar, Atul Sreedharan, L.C. Sudarshan,) Advocates, R.N. Keshwani, Manoj Swarup, Ms. Lalita Kohli, T. Harish Kumar, V. Krishnamurthy, M.K. Krishnamurthi, (Pramod Sharma) Advocate Rajesh, (Subodh Markandeya,) Advocate for Ms. Chitra Markandeya, A. Sharan, Sunil Kumar, Dr. Sumant Bhardwaj, (V.S. Raju) Advocate for Ms. Mridula Ray Bhardwaj, A.D.N. Rao and Arvind K. Sharma, Advocates.
Held : There is no question here of giving retrospective effect to 1981 Rules. It is, in our opinion, open to the employer, namely, Union of India and it is its prerogative, as a matter of policy, to introduce an intermediate post and lay down the conditions of eligibility of Group-B officer in Class-II for promotion to such intermediate post of Group-A in Class-I (Junior Scale). Such an introduction of an intermediate post does, not in our opinion, amount to interfering with any vested rights, even assuming that the contention that vested rights cannot be interfered with, is to be accepted as correct. What all has happened here is that an intermediate post has been created prospectively for future promotions from Group-B Class-II to Group-A Class-I. If, before these rules of 1981 came into force, these officers were eligible to be directly promoted as Commandants under the 1974 rules but before they got any such promotions, the 1981 Rules came in obliging them to go through an intermediate post, this does not amount to interfering with any vested rights. Further before 1981 among the Group-B officers in Class-II, there were direct recruits upto 30 and promotees upto 60 and transferees upto 10 . It would not be correct to permit the direct recruits in Class-B to be governed by the 1974 Rules for direct promotion to the post of Commandant leaving the promotees and transferees to go by the 1981 Rules and through the intermediate post. Further, these officers were specifically recruited to Group-B as they came lower in the merit list at the time of their appointment prior to 1981 while those recruited after the 1981 Rules were persons who were specifically recruited for the intermediate post in Group-A. Further there is no difficulty with regard to fitment of the existing Assistant Commandants (Class II) on the coming into force of the Rules of 1981 for all those who were Asstt. Commandants or of equal grade came to be designated as group B (Class II) officers. (Para 13)
(ii) SERVICE LAW-Railway Protection Force (Superior Officers) Recruitment Rules, 1974-Railway Protection Force (Group A and B Posts) Recruitment Rules, 1981-Seniority-Inter se seniority between Group-B and Group-A officers for purposes of higher promotion-Whether draft policy of Union of India as prepared by UPSC in its letter dated 10.12.1991 and as modified by the letter dated 3.8.1992 is fair and equitable for reckoning inter se seniority?-(Yes)-A fair and proper balancing of rights of Group A and B officers has been made-Principle of weightage proposed to be applied in these letters is unassailable-Directions of implementation of policy. (Paras 20 to 25)
JUDGMENT
M. Jagannadha Rao, J.-Leave granted in S.L.P. (C) No. 7076 of 1995.
2. These cases raise common questions relating to seniority of officers in the rank of Commandant/Security Officer/Asstt. Inspector General/Dy. Director/Divisional Security Officer. The Rules which are relevant are the Railway Protection Force (Superior Officers) Recruitment Rules, 1974 (hereinafter called the 1974 rules ) and the Railway Protection Force (Group A and B Posts) Recruitment Rules, 1981 (hereinafter called the 1981 Rules ). Eight writ petitions filed in various High Courts have been transferred to this Court and registered as Transferred Petitions, to be disposed alongwith Civil Appeal arising out of the judgment of a Division Bench of the Calcutta High Court on appeal from the judgment of a learned Single Judge of that Court. We also have before us an independent Writ Petition No. 98 of 97 filed under Article 32 of the Constitution of India.
3. Before referring to the facts of the cases it will be necessary to refer to the hierarchy of posts and the mode of recruitment and promotion under the 1974 rules as well as under the 1981 rules and the conditions for eligibility for promotions.
4. Under the 1974 Rules the hierarchy of posts was as follows. Initially the recruitment was to the post of Assistant Commandant/Assistant Security Officer in Class-II Group-B (hereinafter called generally as Assistant Commandant Cadre for convenience) in the pay scale of Rs. 350-900. Further promotion from that post was to the post of Commandant/Assistant Inspector General/Security Officer (Class-I, Group-A) in the pay scale of Rs. 700-1250. The promotion was by way of selection through the Departmental Promotion Committee and the condition of eligibility was that a person should have put in 8 years of regular service in the post of Assistant Commandant. So far as the post of Assistant Commandant at lower level is concerned, the said cadre was consisting of 30 direct recruits to that post and 60 promotees from a post which was below the post of Assistant Commandant and 10 by way of transfer etc. From the post of Commandant the further promotion was to the post of Deputy Chief Security Officer in Class-I, Group-A bearing a pay-scale of Rs. 1300-1600. The promotion was through the DPC and the condition of eligibility was that a person should have put in 5 years regular service as Commandant.
5. Under the 1981 Rules which came into force from 8th May, 1981, direct recruitment to the post of Assistant Commandant (Group-B, Class-II) in the pay scale of Rs. 650-1200 was completely stopped and the said post was to be filled entirely by promotees below the post of Assistant Commandant. From the said post of Assistant Commandant (Group-B, Class-II) instead direct promotion to the post of commandant as was obtaining under the 1974 rules, an intermediate post was created in Class-I in the pay scale of Rs. 700-1300 but the designation was the same namely Assistant Commandant/Assistant Security Officer. In the departmental communications this is described as Group-A, Class-I Junior Scale post. The recruitment to the intermediate post was 40 by promotion of Assistant Commandants who had put in 3 years of regular service. The promotion being from Class II to Class-I the promotees had to go through the DPC. The remaining 60 in this intermediate post was to be filled up by direct recruitment through the Union Public Service Commission. The next promotion from this intermediate post was to the post of Commandant/Security Officer/Assistant Inspector General/Deputy Director/Divisional Security Officer (hereinafter generally called Commandants cadre for convenience). In the departmental communication this is described as Group-A, Class-I post Senior Scale.
6. For promotion as Commandant, assistant Commandants in Group-A, Class-I are eligible under the 1981 Rules after 5 years of regular service. The promotion being from being Class I to Class I there is no DPC. From the pos
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.