SUHAS C.SEN, S.P.BHARUCHA
Pardeep Aggarbatti, Ludhiana – Appellant
Versus
State Of Punjab – Respondent
ORDER
C.A. No. 1175 of 1992
The judgment and order under appeal by special leave was delivered by a Division Bench of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana. It reversed the judgment and order of a learned Single Judge allowing the writ petition filed by the appellant.
2. The appellant is a registered dealer in dhoop and aggarbatti and we are concerned with its assessment to sales tax thereon under the provisions of the Punjab General Sales Tax Act, 1948, for the period 1973-74.
3. Entry No. 16 of Schedule A to the said Act at the relevant time read thus:
"Cosmetics, perfumery an toilet goods, excluding tooth-paste, tooth-powder, kum-kum and soap."
The said Entry No. 16 was broken up into Entries 16 and 16A by a notification dated 28th September, 1979. The new Entries read thus:
"16. Cosmetics and toilet goods excluding tooth-paste, tooth-powder, kum kum and soap.
16A. Perfumery including dhoop and Aggarbatti."
4. The appellant was sought to be made liable to pay sales tax at the rate of 10 paisa in a rupee, as was leviable upon times falling under the said Entry No. 16, on the basis that dhoop and aggarbatti were covered by the word "perfumery" therein. The writ petition filed by the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.