SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(SC) 1481

M.M.PUNCHHI, M.SRINIVASAN
Najjam Faraghi Nijjam Faruqui – Appellant
Versus
State Of W. B. – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Srinivasan, J.-The appellant is challenging the concurrent judgments of the courts below whereby he was convicted for an offence under Section 302 I.P.C. and sentenced to suffer imprisonment for life. He was also directed to pay a fine of Rs. 5000/-.

2. On the night of 29.6.85 the appellant poured kerosene oil over the head of his wife from behind and lit a matchstick and set her on fire. She was admitted in the hospital around 1.00 A.M. on 30.6.85. Her statement regarding cause of her death was recorded on 1.7.85 by PW 18, Sub Inspector of police marked as Ex. 6. Another statement marked as Ex. 5 was recorded on 11.7.85 by PW 12, a Magistrate, who was sent to the hospital under orders of the High Court. In both the statements she had stated that her husband came home in a drunk condition in the mid night of 29.6.85 and assaulted her severely. She was driven out of the room but as her two children were sleeping inside she went back to the room. Then he poured kerosene oil from behind and set fire. Her parents were sent for and her father took her to the hospital. Thus in both the statements she had accused her husband of having set fire to her after pouring kerosene. The cou























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top