D.P.WADHWA, SUJATA V.MANOHAR
State Of U. P. – Appellant
Versus
Nand Kumar Aggarwal – Respondent
JUDGMENT
D.P. Wadhwa, J.-This appeal is against the judgment of the Allahabad High Court allowing the writ petition filed by the 1st respondent holding that the agricultural land comprised in village Para falling within the boundary of Lucknow Mahapalika was exempt under the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulations) Act, 1976 (for short the Act ).
2. Issue involved in this appeal is very narrow. After the enforcement of the Act on February 17, 1976 1st respondent filed return under Section 6(1) of the Act before the Competent Authority constituted under the Act. First respondent gave details of his properties and one such property was land measuring 16 Bighas 1 Biswa 7 Biswansis in village Para. The Competent Authority after examining the return sent a draft statement to the 1st respondent showing the land in village Para as agricultural land. However, he proposed this land to be surplus land after applying the parameters fixed under the Act. In this appeal we are not concerned with other properties of the 1st respondent.
3. Against the order of the Competent Authority 1st respondent filed an appeal before the District Judge, Lucknow under Section 33 of the Act who dismissed the appeal. F
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.