SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(SC) 1640

G.B.PATTANAIK, G.T.NANAVATI
State of Karnataka – Appellant
Versus
Shivappa Gurusiddappa – Respondent


Judgment

Nanavati, J.-These two appeals arise out of the common judgment of the High Court of Karnataka in Criminal Appeal Nos. 334/86, 341/86 and 425/86. Criminal Appeal No. 634/89 is filed by the State of Karnataka against 13 respondents originally accused Nos. 1 and 5 to 16 and who had filed a separate appeal in the High Court. Criminal Appeal No. 635/89 is filed against 3 respondents, original accused Nos. 2 to 4 and who had also filed a separate appeal before the High Court.

2. The prosecution case was that P.W. 4 had a share in the land bearing No. 180/1 and that accused Nos. 1 to 4 were obstructing him in culti­vation of the said land. P.W. 4 had, therefore, on the day prior to the day of incident filed an application before the police complaining against accused Nos. 1 to 4. On 4.10.1984 between 12.30 p.m. and 1.45 p.m. all the 16 accused armed with deadly weapons went to the said field to take possession of the land. In the field Rudragowda, Sidda­gowda, Balasaheb Eragowda P.W. 3 Irappa, P.W. 4 Kadappa, P.W. 5 Maha­dev, P.W. 7 Sadashiva and P.W. 9 Ningappa were present. All the ac­cused started beating those persons as a result of which 4 persons namely, Rudragowda, Siddago





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top