SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(SC) 1571

SUHAS C.SEN, S.SAGHIR AHMAD
Maddi Venkataraman And Company Private LTD. – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner Of Income Tax – Respondent


Judgment

Sen, J.-The Tribunal referred the following question of law to the Andhra Pradesh High Court under Section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

“1. Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, a sum of Rs. 2,95,000/- has to be taken into account in computing the income of the assessee from business under the provisions of Section 28 of the Income Tax Act, 1961?

If the answer to the above question is in the negative-

Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the claim of Rs. 2,95,000/- is covered by sub-rule (j) of Rule 6-DD, framed under Section 40A(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961?”

2. “Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the sum of Rs. 19,659/- incurred as quest-expenses is allowable as a deduction?”

2. The assessee, to start with, was a partnership consisting mostly of family members. In 1965, it was converted into a public limited company to carry on the business of export of tobacco. The first directors appointed at the time of incorporation were to hold office during their lifetime or until they resigned voluntarily.

3. On the basis of the information received, a search was conducted by the Enforc



































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top