SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(SC) 86

S.P.BHARUCHA, K.VENKATASWAMI
Raj Bahadur Sharma – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent


JUDGMENT

K. Venkataswami, J.-Special leave granted.

2. The short question that arises for our consideration in this appeal is whether the respondents are justified in depriving the appellant (who has died pending appeal) the salary for the period from 20.2.81 to 17.5.88. The legal representatives of the deceased appellant are prosecuting this appeal. For the sake of convenience, the deceased appellant will be referred to herein as the appellant.

3. To appreciate the question, brief facts are necessary, which are as follows:-

The deceased appellant was an employee in the Railways. By an order dated 28.6.77, he was placed under suspension with effect from 1.7.77. The suspension was revoked by another order on 28.1.81. He preferred an application successfully under the provisions of the Payment of Wages Act claiming wages for the period he was kept under suspension. The respondents preferred an appeal to the learned District Judge against the order of the Authority under the Payment of Wages Act and the appeal was allowed. Against that, the appellant preferred a Writ Petition before the High Court at Allahabad and that was allowed by the High Court on 5.9.84.

4. In the meanwhile, the appel













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top