SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(SC) 106

1998(1) Supreme 297
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
(From Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tri-bunal)
Sujata V. Manohar & D.P. Wadhwa, JJ.
State of Andhra Pradesh -Appellant
versus
V.C. Subbarayudu & Ors. -Respondents
Civil Appeal No. 5131 of 1992
Decided on 22-1-1998
Counsel for the Parties :
For the Appellant : Mr. K. Ram Kumar and Mr. A. Subba Rao, Advocates.
For the Respondents : Mr. B. Kanta Rao and Mr. S. Udaya Kumar Sagar, Advocates.

Headnote:SERVICE LAW-Tribunal gave a direction that Accountants belonging to Subordinate Accounts Service of the Ac-countant General Office working on the date of take over as Divisional Accountants in the State Service shall also be given op-tion to be absorbed in the State as per GOM(s) 304 of Nov. 20, 1979 issued by State of Audhra Pradesh-Appeal-Posts of Divisional Accountants were created by State Government in Public Works Divi-sion of Irrigation-Administrative control vested with the Accountant-General, An-dhra Pradesh-A three Men Committee appointed to advise the Government on desirability of taking over the cadre of Di-visional Accountants from the administrative control of the Accountant General-Recommendation of the Committee for the take over of the cadre-Order for transfer of the cadres of Divisional Accountants to the State Government-Challenged -Officers of the SAS Cadre working with the State Government contended that un-der clause (i) of para 5 of the GOM they should also be given option to be absorbed in the State Service-State s case that op-tions were to be limited to Divisional Ac-counts only-Whether impugned judgment of the Tribunal holding in favour of offi-cers of the SAS cadre is sustainable?-(No).

       Held : The GOM and even para 5 clearly show that it was the take over of the cadre of Divisional Accountants from the administrative control of the Accountant General, Andhra Pradesh and not of the cadre of SAS. (Para 6)

       The Three Man Committee, as men-tioned in the GOM 304 reproduced above, which had been constituted and on the rec-ommendation of which GOM was issued did, however, recommend that SAS Accountants working in heavy and important divisions in the State might be taken over by the State Government while constituting the separate cadre and that they be put in to Grade-I automatically. This recommendation, it would appear, did not find favour with the State Government and under GOM 304 the State Government decided to take over only the cadre of Divisional Accountants from the administrative control of the Accountant General and not the cadre of SAS. It is a matter of policy for the State Government which in its wisdom decided to create a sepa-rate cadre in the State by absorbing the Divi-sional Accountants working on deputation in the State and who were under the administra-tive control of the Accountant General, An-dhra Pradesh. This Court cannot give any direction to the State Government to have a different policy and also absorb the SAS Ac-countants in its newly constituted service. That the State Government will use the bene-fit of more experienced officers of SAS cadre is for the State to consider. Merely on that ground plea of discrimination cannot be ad-vanced. (Para 7)

       Further held that the Tribunal reached its conclusion on the interpretation of clause (i) of para 5 while looking at this clause only as it was not having the benefit of whole of the GOM 304. This clause (i) read with clause (iv), the operative words of para and the option to be exercised unmistakably show the State Government wanted to take over cadre of Divisional Accountants only. In our view, there is no ambiguity in clause (i) of para 5 of the GOM for us to go into the rec-ommendation of the Three Man Committee to take a view consistent with that taken by the Tribunal. While considering the clause equi-table consideration do not come into play. When clause is clear, effect has to be given to it and no question of any strict or liberal con-struction would arise. (Para 8)

       

JUDGMENT

D.P. Wadhwa, J.-Judgment dated De-cember 20, 1991 of the Andhra Pradesh Admin-istrative Tribunal (for short Tribunal ) is im-pugned before us. By this judgment the Tribunal gave a direction that Accountants belonging to Subordinate Accounts Service (SAS) of the Ac-countant General Office who were working on the date of take over as the Divisional Account-ants in the State Service shall also be given op-tion to be absorbed in State as per GOM(s) 304 of November 20, 1979 issued by the Government of Andhra Pradesh. According to the appellant the State of Andhra Pradesh the GOM 304 con-templated option only from Divisional Account-ants in the Accountants General Office on the date of take over in the State service.

2. As to how the controversy arose can be best seen by reference to GOM 304 itself. As to the necessity for creating a separate service for State of the Divisional Accountants, it records as under:

"The posts of Divisional Accountants are created by the State Government in the Public Works Divisions of Irrigation in-cluding Major Projects, Roads and Build-ings and Public Health etc., but the ad-ministrative control i.e., recruitment to the posts, appointments, transfers, disci-plinary control etc., vest with the Ac-countant-General, Andhra Pradesh. How-ever, in their day to day working, the Di-visional Accountants come under the immediate control of Executive Engi-neers of the Divisions. They assist the Executive Engineers to render accounts to the Accountant-General, Andhra Pradesh, which are different from the ac-counts maintained in the Treasuries. Their pay and allowances and service conditions are at present governed by the Central Government rules but they are paid by the State Government.

2. The question of taking over the cadre of Divisional Accountants from the ad-ministrative control of the Accountant-General, Andhra Pradesh has been under consideration of the State Government for some time past. A Three Man Committee was appointed by the State Government in G.O. Ms. No. 663, Irrigation and Power (Service-III) Department, dated 3rd September 1976 to advise the Gov-ernment on the desirability or otherwise of taking over the cadre of Divisional Ac-countants from the administrative control of the Accountant-General, Andhra Pradesh. The Three Man Committee after going through the various points at issue and studying the set up in other states recommended that the cadre of Divisional Accountants be taken over by the State Government as early as possible. The re-port was first examined in detail by the Irrigation and Power Department in con-sultation with the concerned Department viz., Transport, Roads and Buildings, Housing, Municipal Administration and Urban Development, Panchayat Raj and Finance and Planning. The recommenda-tions of the Three Man Committee were again examined by Secretaries to Gov-ernment, Finance and Planning, Irrigation and Power, Transport, Roads and Buildings, Panchayat Raj and Housing, Municipal Administration and Urban Development Departments. They agreed in principle with the recommendation of Three Man Committee for the take over of the cadre of Divisional Accountants by the State Government. The Accountant-General, Andhra Pradesh was addressed in the reference 1st read above to obtain the concurrence of the Comptroller and Auditor-General of India for the State Government taking over the administra-tion of Divisional Accountants in this State. The Accountant-General, Andhra Pradesh in his D.O. letter fourth read above had conveyed the approval of the Comptroller and Auditor-General of In-dia to the transfer of the Cadres of Divi-sional Accountants to the State Govern-ment.

3. After a detailed examination in consul-tation with the Accountant-General, An-dhra Pradesh and in order to have proper control over expenditure and over ac-counts matters generally in Divisional Offices which is very essential and im-portant in view of the heavy expenditure incurred in various engineering depar






























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top