S.C.AGRAWAL, S.RAJENDRA BABU, B.N.KIRPAL
Commissioner Of Income Tax, Madras – Appellant
Versus
Urmila Ramesh – Respondent
Judgment
Kirpal, J.-These appeals arise by virtue of a certificate having been granted by the Madras High Court under Section 261 of Income Tax Act, 1961 and the common questions of law referred relate to the interpretation of Section 2(22) of Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”).
2. Briefly stated, the facts are that the respondents-assesses were share-holders of Tinnevely Motor Service Company Private Limited. The road transport business of the respondents was taken over by the then State of Madras as a result of which the said company went into voluntary liquidation on 28.3.1970. After the sale of its assets the liquidator distributed the first dividend on 31.3.1970 at the rate of Rs. 100/- per share, the second dividend on 17.4.1970 at the rate of Rs. 40/- per share and the third dividend on 20.10.1971 at the rate of Rs. 25/- per share. In the assessment of several share-holders, the income-tax Officer held, inter alia, that the accumulated profits of the company on the date of liquidation amounted to Rs. 6,61,065/-. Based on this figure, the income-tax officer treated 17.5 per share as dividend for the year 1970-71 and 57.75 of the dividend of Rs. 40/-
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.