SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(SC) 101

S.P.KURDUKAR, B.N.KIRPAL
Kishan Lal – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent


Order

Heard learned counsel for the parties. In the instant case interest was sought to be levied on the appellant under Section 220(2) of the Income-Tax Act on account of default having been committed by the appel­lant in payment of Income Tax within time. In order to avoid this levy, the appellant filed an application under sub-section (2-A) of Section 220 before the Central Board of Direct Taxes, inter-alia, stating facts and reasons as to why the amount of interest which was payable should be reduced, if not waived altogether. Reasons for seeking a favourable order were contained in the application.

2. The appellant received a letter dated 29th January, 1987 whereby this application was rejected. The said letter reads as follows:-

“Please refer to your petition dated nil and further petition dated 24.11.86 on the subject mentioned above. The matter has been examined by the Board. After considering the application filed by you and the report of CIT in the matter, the Board is of the view that the condi­tions as laid down in Section 220(2A) are not satisfied in your case and hence regrets its inability to interfere in the matter.”

3. A Writ Petition under Art. 226 of the Constitutio




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top