Judgment

M. Jagannadha Rao, J.-Leave granted.

2. This is an appeal by the tenant against the judgment of the learned Single Judge of the High Court of Andhra Pradesh in Civil Revision Petition No. 56 of 1994 dated 6.3.1997. By that judgment, the learned Single Judge reversed the concurrent findings of the appellate author­ity as well as the Rent Controller and ordered the eviction petition in favour of the respondent - landlord.

3. The eviction application was filed by the respondent against appel­lants in the year 1985 on three grounds namely wilful default, bona­fide requirement for self-occupation and sub-letting. The learned Rent Controller by his judgment dated 31.7.1988 dismissed the eviction application.

4. On appeal by the landlord the appellate authority again framed three points for consideration namely with regard to wilful default, bonafide requirement and subletting and came to the conclusion that none of the grounds was proved. In the result, the appeal of the landlord was dismissed on 20.9.1993.

5. The landlord then filed revision in the High Court. It was merely observed by the High Court as follows :

“Having gone through the orders of the courts below, I feel that the co