SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(SC) 282

K.VENKATASWAMI, A.P.MISRA
A. K. Mitra – Appellant
Versus
D. Appa Rao – Respondent


Judgment

K. Venkataswami, J.-The appellants are aggrieved by the order dated 9.8.89 of the Central Administrative Tribunal, Patna Bench, in O.A. No. 172/88.

2. The first respondent moved the said O.A. No. 172/88 before the Central Admi­nistrative Tribunal for declaring that his seni­ority must be counted w.e.f. 11.4.72 for further promotion to the post of Section Officer (General) and the consequential benefits also must be given to him. The Tribunal, while giving the relief of declaration declaring that the first respondent herein was entitled to claim seniority w.e.f. 11.4.72, declined to grant the consequential benefits.

3. The appellants are aggrieved by the declaration given by the Tribu­nal in favour of the first respondent. Hence, the present appeal by special leave.

4. The Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (hereinafter called the ‘CSIR’) is a Society registered under the Societies Regis­tration Act, 1860 for doing inter alia research in the field of science and techno­logy. The first respondent joined National Metallur­gical Laboratory, the second appellant, (for short ‘NML’), a Unit of CSIR, as unskilled Laboratory Bearer on an ad hoc basis on 29.12.59 and was subs









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top