A.P.MISRA, K.VENKATASWAMI
Kamlesh Kumar Sharma – Appellant
Versus
Yogesh Kumar Gupta – Respondent
Judgment
Misra, J.-The question raised in this appeal is the interpretation of Section 13(4) of the U.P. Higher Education Services Commission Act, 1980 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) as amended in 1992.
2. The appellant interprets that the vacancies to be filled in under this sub-section are not only those which occur on account of death or resignation but would include any other vacancy occuring till another list is sent by the Commission under Section 13(2) of the Act. In other words, it would also include vacancies not advertised but occuring even for the subsequent academic year. In order to appreciate the question raised, the background and the facts would be useful, which are stated:
3. Prior to the aforesaid Act, the appointment to the post of teachers in the Non-Governmental Colleges affiliated to the various Universities in the State of Uttar Pradesh was made by the Selection Committee of the Management of the concerned college. For various reasons, the said process was not found to be congenial and the aforesaid Act was enacted. Sections 12 to 14 of the Act contained procedure for appointment of teachers as well as Principles. Section 16 provided for the appoin
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.