A.P.MISRA, K.VENKATASWAMI
Mohan Karan – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. – Respondent
Judgment
K. Venkataswami, J.-The appellant, feeling aggrieved by the promotion given to the second respondent herein as Chief Town Planner. Bareilly, as per the order dated 6/7.7.92, moved the Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench, with a prayer for the issue of Writ of Certiorari to quash the selection of the second respondent as Chief Town Planner (Mukhya Nagar Niyojak) and also for the issue of Writ of Mandamus directing the first respondent to consider his case for the post of Chief Town Planner and to promote him to the said post with consequential benefits.
2. Short facts leading to the filing of the Writ Petition No. 3849/92 before the High Court are the following:-
On the coming into force of the U.P. Urban Planning and Development Act, 1973, the ‘Development Authorities’ were constituted for the declared development areas. One such Development Authority constituted in September, 1974 was the Lucknow Development Authority. The said Authority had the power to appoint officers and employees for the performance of functions entrusted to it under Section 5(2) of the 1973 Act. A proposal for creation of certain posts in the Planning Section of the Lucknow Development Authority wa
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.