SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(SC) 359

G.T.NANAVATI, V.N.KHARE
State Of Rajasthan – Appellant
Versus
Mahaveer – Respondent


Judgment

Nanavati, J.-Both these appeals arise out of the judgment and order passed by the High Court of Rajasthan in Criminal Appeal Nos. 398 and 382 of 1983. The High Court acquitted the appellants in those appeals and, therefore, the State has preferred these appeals against their acquittal.

2. According to the prosecution about 12 to 13 persons armed with guns and other weapons had gone to the house of Babu on 22.8.1981 at about 5.30 p.m. and shot dead Ram Bharosa, Shankar and Bhikha. They had burnt the house of Babu and also taken away certain articles belonging to the persons residing therein. Eleven out of the them were challaned by the police. As two accused were absconding, the trial proceeded against the remaining nine accused. One of them was found to be a child witness and therefore his trial separated. Out of eight accused who came to be tried for the offences punishable under Sections 148, 302, 302/149 and 436 IPC, the trial Court convicted seven. They had preferred two separate appeals one was by five accused and the other by two. The High Court acquitted them all on the grounds that the version given by the four eye-witnesses was improbable, that they had made materia








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top