SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(SC) 424

G.N.RAY, K.VENKATASWAMI
State Of W. B. – Appellant
Versus
Ranbindra Nath Sengupta – Respondent


Judgment

G.N. Ray, J.-Leave granted. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. This appeal is directed against judgment dated 17.5.1994 passed by the Division Bench of Calcutta High Court in F.M.A.T. No. 1966 of 1992 allowing the appeal and setting aside the judgment of the Single Bench of the said High Court in the Writ Petition being Civil Rule No. 11360 (W) of 1990.

3. The aforesaid writ petition was made by the respondents Rabindra Nath Sengupta and other petitioners being employees of the State Government who had been allotted government flats and had been paying assessed amounts for such occupation and were enjoying the House Rent Allowance.

4. In order to appreciate the rival contentions of the parties it will be appropriate to note certain facts. After the submissions of Third Pay Commission’s Report, the West Bengal Services (Revision of Pay and Allowance) Rules, 1990 (hereinafter referred to as ROPA Rules) was published. In the writ petition being CR No. 11360 (W) of 1997, the writ petitioners challenged the provisions of House Rent Allowance in the ROPA Rules and the Notification issued in this regard. The ROPA Rules provided for House Rent Allowance to the following effect:




































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top