SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(SC) 615

S.P.KURDUKAR, G.T.NANAVATI
Grid Corporation Of Orissa – Appellant
Versus
Indian Charge Chrome LTD. – Respondent


Judgment

S.P. Kurdukar, J.-Leave granted

2. These appeals are directed against a common Judgment and order dated 10.2.98 passed by the Learned Chief Justice of Orissa High Court, Cuttack in Miscellaneous Appeal Nos. 599/97, 600/97 and MJC No. 229/97. All these appeals are being disposed of by this Judgment.

The brief facts leading to the present controversy may be summarised as under:-

3. The GRID Corporation of Orissa Ltd., (for short ‘the GRIDCO’) is the appellant in all these appeals whereas M/s. Indian Charge Chrome Ltd., (for short ‘ICCL’) is the respondent. GRIDCO was the appellant in Miscellaneous Appeal Nos. 599/97-600/97 whereas ICCL was the peti­tioner in MJC No. 229/97 before the Orissa High Court.

4. The GRIDCO became the successor of the Orissa State Electricity Board (hereinafter referred to as ‘OSEB’) w.e.f. 1.4.1996 and was engaged in the business of transmission, distribution and supply of electricity to various consumers in the State of Orissa. Indian Metals and Ferro Alloys Company (For short ‘IMFA’) is a sister con­cern of ICCL. ICCL sometime in 1984 corresponded with the Government of Orissa seeking permission to generate power. Accordingly after completing the f





























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top