SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(SC) 242

G.T.NANAVATI, V.N.KHARE
Shambhu Dayal – Appellant
Versus
Subhash Chandra – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Nanavati, J.-Both these appeals, one by the State and the other by the original informant Shambhu Dayal, are filed against the judgment and order passed by the Allahabad High Court in Criminal Appeal No. 731 of 1987. The High Court acquitted all the six respondents, who were convicted awnd sentenced to death by the court of sessions, Pratapgarh in Sessions Trial Case No. 91 of 1978 for the offence punishable under Section 396 IPC. Respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 4 were also convicted under Section 412 IPC and sentenced to suffer five years rigorous imprisonment.

2. Briefly stated the prosecution case was that during the night intervening 12/13.10.1977 the six respondents along with one Dinesh committed dacoity in the house of Dal Chand, and in order to commit dacoity caused injuries to Manohari Devi, Bimla Devi, Dayavanti, Pradeep, Sandeep, Anita, Dal Chand Darshani Devi and Surji Devi, out of whom as many as six injured, namely, Manohari Devi, Bimla Devi, Dayavanti, Pradeep, Sandeep and Anita lost their lives after some time. It is the prosecution case that during the investigation respondents Bhanu Pratap, Bhola, Ramesh, Virender and Govind were identified by some of the prosecut












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top