SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(SC) 836

S.P.BHARUCHA, J.JAGANNADHA RAO
Collector Of Central Excise, Patna – Appellant
Versus
Tata Engineering And Locomotive Company LTD. – Respondent


Judgment

S.P. Bharucha, J.-The Revenue assails the correctness of the judgment and order of the Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribu­nal. The appeals involve the interpretation of Section 9 of the Indus­tries (Development and Regulation) Act, 1951, the notification dated 28th December, 1983, issued thereunder and Rules 2 and 3 of the Auto­mobile Cess Rules, 1984. The relevant provisions are reproduced :-

The Industries (Development & Regulation) Act, 1951:

“Section 9.-Imposition of cess on scheduled industries in certain cases. -(1) There may be levied and collected as a cess for the pur­poses of this Act on all goods manufactured or produced in any such scheduled industry as may be specified in this behalf by the Central Government by notified order a duty of excise at such rate as may be specified in the notified order, and different rates may be specified for different goods or different classes of goods:

Provided that no such rate shall in any case exceed two annas per cent of value of the goods.

Explanation : In this sub-section, the expression “value” in relation to any goods shall be deemed to be the wholesale cash price for which such goods of the like kind and qua




























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top