SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(SC) 627

S.RAJENDRA BABU, SUJATA V.MANOHAR
Commissioner Of Income Tax, M. P. , Bhopal – Appellant
Versus
H. H. Maharani Usha Devi – Respondent


Judgment

Mrs. Sujata V. Manohar, J.-The assessee is the ex-Ruler of the erst­while Holkar State. The assessee was assessed as an individual and the assessment year involved is 1972-73.

2. In 1949, the Ministry of States, New Delhi had accepted certain heirloom jewellery as private properties of His late Highness Maharaja Keshaw Rao Holkar of Indore. These included a Sirpech” and a Ceremoni­al belt. All the listed jewellery and gold in the Huzur Jawahirkhana at Indore in 1949 and used by the Ruler of Indore on ceremonial occa­sions as in the past, were exempt under the provisions of Section 6(1)(xiv) of the Wealth-Tax Act.

3. During the accounting year relating to the assessment year 1972-73, the assessee sold two items of heirloom jewellery for Rs. 13,80,001/-. The assessee claimed before the Tribunal that the heirloom jewellery constituted personal effects of the assessee within the meaning of Section 2(14) of the Income-Tax Act, 1961, and, therefore, the sale of this jewellery did not give rise to any taxable capital gains. This contention was negatived by the Tribunal. The Tribunal, however, framed the following question for reference before the High Court of Madhya Pradesh under S


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top