SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(SC) 661

D.P.WADHWA, S.P.KURDUKAR, SUJATA V.MANOHAR, G.B.PATTANAIK, S.C.AGRAWAL, S.RAJENDRA BABU
Municipal Corporation For The City Of Thane – Appellant
Versus
Asmaco Plastic Industries – Respondent


Judgment

Rajendra Babu, J.-In these appeals, the questions that arise for consideration are as follows :-

(i) Whether for the purpose of levy of Octroi duty P.V.C. Resins in Powder form would fall under ‘plastic and plastic goods, plastic powder’ in Item 53(c) of Schedule I to Maharashtra Municipality (Octroi Duty) Rules, 1968 framed under the Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporation Act, 1949 or under Item 32(c) of Schedule H to the Munici­pal Corporation (Levy of) Octroi Rules, 1965 framed under the Bombay Municipal Corporation Act, 1888.

(ii) Whether for the purpose of levy of Octroi duty Synthetic Hydrocarbon resin is to be treated as ‘plastic and plastic goods, plastic powder’ in Item 32(c) of Schedule H to the Municipal Corpora­tion (Levy of) Octroi Rules 1965 framed under the Bombay Municipal Corporation Act, 1888.

2. Civil Appeals Nos. 3491-93 of 1992 relate to Octroi duty levied by the Municipal Corporation of Thane which is governed by the Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporation Act, 1949. Octroi duty is levied by the said Corporation under the Maharashtra Municipality (Octroi duty) Rules, 1968 and the relevant entries which were conside












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top