SUJATA V.MANOHAR, M.SRINIVASAN
Government Servant Co-operative House Building Society LTD. – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent
Judgment
Mrs. Sujata V. Manohar, J.-The appellants are the owners of properties in Delhi which are governed by the Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957 or the Punjab Municipal Act, 1911. Prior to coming into force of the Delhi Rent Control (Amendment) Act, 1988, these properties were governed by the Delhi Rent Control Act of 1958.
2. By the Delhi Rent Control (Amendment) Act, 1988 sub-sections 3(c) and (d) were added in Section 3 of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958. These provide that nothing in the said Act shall apply “(c) to any premises, whether residential or not, whose monthly rent exceeds three thousand and five hundred rupees”; or “(d) to any premises constructed on or after the commencement of the Delhi Rent Control (Amendment) Act, 1988, for a period of ten years from the date of completion of such construction”. On the said provisions coming into force the appellants received notices under Section 126 of the Delhi Municipal Corporation Act for the assessment year 1988-89 and for subsequent years proposing to revise the rateable value of their properties. The footnote to those notices stated that this was in view of the amendments to the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1988.
The Corporation of Calcutta v. Smt. Padma Debi & Ors.
Dr. Balbir Singh & Ors. etc. etc. v. Municipal Corporation, Delhi & Ors.
Patel Gordhandas Hargovindas v. Municipal Commissioner, Ahmedabad
Assistant Commissioner of Urban Land Tax & Ors. v. The Buckingham and Carnatic Co. Ltd. etc.
Dewan Daulat Rai Kapoor & Ors. v. New Delhi Municipal Committee & Ors.
East India Commercial Co. Pvt. Ltd. v. Corporation of Calcutta
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.