S.SAGHIR AHMAD, S.C.AGRAWAL, A.S.ANAND
Union Of India – Appellant
Versus
S. P. Anand – Respondent
Judgment
S.C. Agrawal, J.-Leave granted.
This appeal arises out of a Writ Petition (Writ Petition No. 500 of 1998) filed by the respondents (hereinafter referred to as ‘the petitioners’) in the High Court of Madhya Pradesh, Indore Bench. In the said Writ Petition the petitioners have prayed for the following reliefs :-
“In view of the submissions made above it is prayed that the R.No. 1 herein be kindly directed to appoint INDORE as one of the places where the Hon’ble Supreme Court shall commence sittings w.e.f first working day after the summer vacations are over and the R.Nos. 2 and 3 be kindly directed to grant the needed approval as per Art. 130 of the Constitution and extend all such funds as may be required to meet the financial requirements recalling that absence of funds is no alibi in law to provide sittings at INDORE to extend the benefits of Art. 32 which in itself is a Fundamental Right guaranteed by the Constitution makers by placing it in Part III of the Constitution and such costs as deemed fit be also kindly allowed with such other reliefs or moulded reliefs as deemed fit by this Hon’ble Court.”
2. The said Writ Petition was heard by a learned single Judge of the High
Mithilesh Kumar v. R. Venkataraman & Ors.
Himansu Kumar Bose v. Jyoti Prokash Mitter & Ors.
Gunwant Kaur & Ors. v. Municipal Committee, Bhatinda & Co.
Shamsher Singh v. State of Punjab & Anr.
S.P. Anand, Indore v. H.D. Deve Gowda & Ors.
Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record Association & Ors. v. Union of India
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.