SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(SC) 836

D.P.WADHWA, M.K.MUKHERJEE
Ram Kumar Madhusudan Pathak – Appellant
Versus
State Of Gujarat – Respondent


Judgment

M.K. Mukherjee, J.-This appeal under Section 379 of the Code of Criminal Procedure is directed against the judgment dated February 7, 1995 rendered by the Gujarat High Court in Criminal Appeal No. 511 of 1995 whereby it reversed the acquittal of the appellant of the charge under Section 302 IPC recorded in his favour by the Additional City Sessions Judge, Ahmedabad and convicted and sentenced him thereunder. Facts relevant for the purpose of disposal of this appeal are as under:

2. The appellant along with his wife Vasumati (the deceased), his parents, two brothers and a sister used to reside in a four storied house at Maniasa-in-Khadki in the city of Ahmedabad. In the top floor of the house there is only room, which was used by the appellant and his wife as their bed room. On January 4, 1984, the appellant took his evening meal along with the other members of the family and then started gossiping. Vasumati, however was not there at that time. Sometime later the appellant went to his bed room and coming back told them that she was lying unconscious. He called Dr. Suresh Pratap Rai Sah (P.W. 1), their family physician, who examined Vasumati and ad­vised her removal to hospita

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top