SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(SC) 855

G.B.PATTANAIK, SUJATA V.MANOHAR
Hydro Electric Employees Union, U. P. – Appellant
Versus
Sudhir Kumar Sharma – Respondent


Judgment

Pattanaik, J.-Leave granted in all the Special Leave Petitions.

2. This batch of cases are directed against two sets of judgments of Allahabad High Court dealing with the question of amalgamation of the posts of Meter Readers, Sub Station Operators and Switch Board Attend­ants under the U.P. State Electricity Board. One batch of cases deal with the judgments delivered by the Division Bench of Allahabad High Court dated 22.8.95, setting aside the judgment of the learned Single Judge dated 29.9.1994 and allowing the Writ Petitions filed by some of the Meter Readers. At that point of time no Regulation had been framed by the Board under Section 79(c) of the Electricity Supply Act (here­inafter referred to as “the Supply Act”) and the service conditions of the employees of the Board was being determined by issuance of admin­istrative instructions from time to time.

3. The second batch of cases deal with the constitutionality of the Regulation framed by the Board under Section 79(c) of the Supply Act and the High Court by the impugned judgment dated 11.7.1997 holds the Act to be intra-vires. Some of the SLPs have been filed by the employ­ees who were not parties before the High Co































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top