D.P.WADHWA, A.S.ANAND
Kala – Appellant
Versus
Madho Parshad Vaidya – Respondent
Order
This is a tenant’s appeal by special leave. Respondent-landlord filed an eviction petition against the appellants under Section 14 of the Himachal Pradesh Urban Rent Control Act, 1987 (hereinafter ‘the Act’) seeking eviction of the tenant from a shop situate in Moti Bazar, Muhalla Suhra, Mandi Town, H.P. According to the allegations made in the eviction petition the demised premises had been let out to Shri Hira Lal Sehgal, husband of appellant No. 1. Shri Hira Lal Sehgal died on 23rd February, 1983 and appellant No. 1 became the statutory tenant of the premises on his death. It was alleged that appellant No. 1 thereafter sublet the premises to appellant No. 2, Ravinder Kapur and that in the demised premises business was being run by appellant No. 2 though for “the advantage of both the appellants”. The appellants filed a joint reply to the eviction petition and denied sub-letting. It was maintained that appellant No. 2 who is the son of the sister of later Shri Hira Lal Sehgal had been brought up by late Shri Hira Lal Sehgal and that appellant No. 2 was helping late Shri Hira Lal Sehgal in running his business at the demised shop till his death in 1983 and that after his dea
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.