S.C.AGRAWAL, S.SAGHIR AHMAD, G.T.NANAVATI
Vinay Balachandra Joshi – Appellant
Versus
Registrar General, Supreme Court Of India – Respondent
Judgment
Nanavati, J.-All these petitions under Article 32 of the Constitution and applications made therein were finally heard on 16.5.1998 and disposed of by passing the following order:
“I.A....../98 in W.P. (C) No. 883/90: Upon being mentioned taken on Board. The applicant in this I.A. is an advocate and is a member of the Supreme Court Bar Association since 1971 but he is not actively practicing in this Court. He is the Chief Editor of the Supreme Court Cases. He has submitted that in view of the fact that in that capacity he has been closely associated with the work and the needs of the Supreme Court and the Bar in the matter of reporting of the decisions of this Court, facility of a chamber may be extended to him in order to enable him to discharge his functions more effectively. In our opinion, it will be more appropriate for the applicant to submit a representation before Hon’ble the Chief Justice of India setting out the special facts and circumstances of his case and seek exemption from the provisions contained in the rules providing for allotment since the Hon’ble Chief Justice of India alone is competent to make such exemption. The application is disposed of accordin
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.