SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(SC) 1118

G.T.NANAVATI, S.P.KURDUKAR
Dinkar Anna Patil – Appellant
Versus
State Of Maharashtra – Respondent


Judgment

S.P. Kurdukar, J.-Leave granted.

2. The appellants are the direct recruit Sales Tax Officers Class-I in the Sales Tax Department of the State of Maharashtra. They were appointed on or after 6th September, 1988, after following the pre­scribed procedure laid down in the Maharashtra Sales Tax Officers Class-I (Recruit­ment) Rules, 1982 which came into force on October 14, 1982. Respondents 4 to 10 are the departmental promotees to the post of Sales Tax Officers Class-I who will be hereinafter referred to as “promotees”. The appellants seek to impinge the judgment and order dated June 7, 1997 passed by the Maha­rashtra Administrative Tribunal, Mumbai Bench, Mumbai (for short `the Tribunal’) on Original Applica­tion No. 126 of 1995 filed by them challenging the legality and cor­rectness of certain seniority lists published in 1991, 1993 and 1994. These seniority lists are in respect of Sales Tax Officers Class-I comprising of promotees and direct recruits.

3. The Sales Tax Department is an important department which is en­trusted with the work of revenue collection of the Government of Maharashtra. The Sales Tax Department is headed by the Commissioner of Sales Tax as the Princi































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top