SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(SC) 1150

SUJATA V.MANOHAR, G.B.PATTANAIK
V. S. Charati – Appellant
Versus
Hussein Nhanu Jamadar – Respondent


Order

The appellant is the landlord. He has claimed that in a partition effected in the year 1956 in the joint family of which he was a mem­ber, an area admeasuring 1 acre 19 gunthas out of Revision Survey No. 8 of village Kudnoor in Gadhinglaj Taluka came to his share. This land is agriculture land of which the original respondent was a tenant at the material time.

2. On coming into force of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948, the appellant filed an application under Section 31(1) read with Section 29 of the said Act for possession on the ground that he bona fide required the land for personal cultivation. Although the appellant was a minor at the time of the application, he chose to exercise his rights under Section 31(1). This application was ulti­mately dismissed by the Mamlatdar on 29.5.1957 on the ground that under Section 31-B, there is a prohibition against termination of tenancy if such termination would result in contravention of the provisions of Bombay Prevention of Fragmentation and Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1947. Therefore, by virtue of the dismissal of the appellant’s application under Section 31(1), under the provisions of Section 32(1) the respo













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top