G.B.PATTANAIK, SUJATA V.MANOHAR
Director General, Esi Corporation, New Delhi – Appellant
Versus
M. P. John – Respondent
Order
Civil Appeal Nos. 6872-6875 and 7622-23/94
Learned counsel for the appellants states that in view of the decision of this Court in Union of India & Ors. v. G. Vasudevan Pillay & Ors.1 they are not pressing these appeals. The appeals are dismissed as not pressed.
Civil Appeal No. 6890/94
2. Respondent No. 1 who was an ex-serviceman was re-employed by the appellant-Corporation as Lower Division Clerk. His pay was fixed at the minimum of the pay scale and he was also entitled to his full pension as an ex-serviceman. The Government Order of 8.2.83 inter alia, provides that in the case of ex-servicemen who retire before attaining the age of 55 years and are re-employed (in the case of personnel below the rank of a Commissioned Officer) the entire pension may be ignored in fixing the pay on re-employment. This Government Order was in operation at the material time along with the Office Memorandum of 25.11.58.
3. Under the Office Memorandum of 25.11.58, re-employed pensioners were allowed only the prescribed scales of pay. The initial pay, on re-employment, was required to be fixed at the minimum of the scale of pay prescribed for the post in which the ex-serviceman, was re-employed. Ho
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.