SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(SC) 1177

M.K.MUKHERJEE, S.SAGHIR AHMAD
Krishna – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent


Judgment

S. Saghir Ahmad, J.-Section 10A of the Punjab Security of Land Ten­ures Act, 1953 provides that the State Govt. or any officer authorised by it may utilise any surplus area for the resettlement of tenants ejected or to be ejected under clause (i) of sub-section (1) of Sec­tion 9. The further implication of this Section is that if the surplus area, in the meantime, is acquired by the State Govt. under any law for the time being in force, or it passes to an heir by inheritance, the surplus area so acquired or inherited would not be available for utilisation. It was this statutory provision which was sought to be invoked by the appellants who contended that the surplus area, on the death of the original owner, namely Banarsi Das, was inherited by them and, therefore, it could not be utilised in any way, not even by allotment of this area in favour of Mangat Ram, which was liable to be cancelled, but they lost before all the authorities and have ultimate­ly landed in this Court.

2. Leave granted.

3. Banarsi Das, father of the appellants, was the owner of considera­ble land in Village Kanthal Kalan, Dera Kalan, Dera Khurd, District Kurukshetra, Haryana. An area of 137 Kanals 8 Mar







































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top