SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(SC) 123

UMESH C.BANERJEE, M.SRINIVASAN
State Of T. N. – Appellant
Versus
Mahalakshmi Textile Mills LTD. – Respondent


Order

The short facts leading to this appeal are as follows: The respondent-assessee was assessed to sales tax by the Assessment Officer. After some time, he invoked the suo motu powers of the Deputy Commissioner under Section 32 of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act (for short “the Act”) questioning the correctness of the assessment. The Deputy Commissioner dismissed the petition in limine. The assessee filed a writ petition challenging the said order in the High Court. The High Court held that the Deputy Commissioner should entertain the revision and decide it on its merits. The matter was thus remanded.

2. After remand, the Deputy Commissioner once again dismissed the petition on merits. The assessee filed an appeal to the Tribunal which went into the merits and found that the assessee’s contention was correct. Consequently, the appeal was allowed. The said judgment of the Tribunal was challenged by the appellant in revision under the Act.

3. In the revision petition, following three contentions were urged: (1) that the time limit of four years for exercising the suo motu powers of the Deputy Commissioner under Section 32 had expired by the time he passed his order on 19th Februa







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top