SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(SC) 329

K.S.HEGDE, S.P.BHARUCHA
Commissioner Of Income Tax – Appellant
Versus
Mysodet Private LTD. bangalore – Respondent


Judgment

Santosh Hegde, J.-This appeal from the judgment and order of the High Court of Karnataka dated 13.12.1989 made in I.T.R.C. No. 21/82.

2. The following question was referred to the High Court for its opinion under Section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) :

“Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribu­nal was right in law in holding that the provision of Section 104 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was applicable to the instant case for the assessment year 1975-76?”

3. The facts leading to the abovesaid reference are as follows :

The respondent-Company is a trading company in which the public are not substantially interested. The assessing authority assessed the income of the Company for the assessment year 1975-76 at Rs. 6,27,430/- holding that the Company did not distribute any dividend to its shareholders. The Income Tax Officer initiated proceedings under Section 104 of the Act, demanding additional income-tax of Rs. 31,434/-.

Against the said assessment order, the respondent-Company preferred an appeal before the Appellate Assistant Commissioner. Having failed before the said Authority, a further appeal was preferre


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top