SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(SC) 489

R.P.SETHI, A.P.MISRA
Lal Woolen And Silk Mills Private LTD. , Amritsar – Appellant
Versus
Collector Of Central Excise, Chandigarh – Respondent


Order

The short question raised for the assessee is, whether he is liable to pay excise duty on dyed worsted woollen yarn when he has already paid the duty onthe worsted woollen grey yarn, if liable, whether he is entitled for set off the difference of excise duty, which he paid for the ‘grey yarn’ while being taxed on the said ‘dyed yarn’? The two Notifications imposing duty on the said two goods are Notifications 235/76 and 236/76. It is not in dispute for the first time separate rate of duties were imposed on ‘grey yarn’ and ‘dyed yarn’ in 1966. Thereafter, through the aforesaid Notifications different tariff values and separate rates of duty were notified for the said two goods. In spite of this the assessee continued to pay the differential duty in view of the earlier practice without any objection from the Department. It is only on 24th August, 1977 notice was issued by the Department refusing such set off. Department case is that woollen yarn is notified in the schedule to Rule 56A of the Central Excise Rules. Thus under this Rule grant of proforma credit is permitted and not any set off subject to the claim by the assessee under sub-rule (2) of Rule 56A. As no such permissi




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top