SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(SC) 459

1999(4) Supreme 23
Supreme Court of India
(Record of Proceedings)
S.P. Bharucha, R.C. Lahoti & N. Santosh Hegde, JJ.
Indian Petrochemicals Corpn. Ltd. & Anr. -Appellants
versus
Shramik Sena & Ors. -Respondents
Civil Appeal No. 1854 of 1998
With
C.A. No. 1855/98 & 1099/99
Decided on 8-4-1999
Counsel for the Parties :
For the Appellants : Mr. T.R. Andhyarujina, Sr. Advocate with M/s. H.S. Parihar, KS Parihar, S. Birla, M.M. Varma, Advocates.
For the Respondents : M/s. G.K. Banerjee, R.S. Raymond, R.N. Karanjawala, Nandini Gore, Sandeep Mittal, Manik Karanjawala, Advocates.
Mr. K.K. Singhvi, Sr. Advocate with M/s. S. Pakale, F. Rashid, A.K. Gupta, Advocates.

Headnote:Supreme Court-Rules of Practice and Procedure-Filing of affidavit placing additional facts on record without express permission of Court-Such a practice not permissible - Registry directed to ensure that no affidavits are taken on record in pending appeals. (Paras 2 & 3)

       

Order

Civil Appeal No. 1854 of 1998 by the employer and Civil Appeal No. 1855 of 1998 by the employees arise from the same judgment of the High Court. Reliance was placed, during the course of their hearing, on an additional affidavit dated 19th February, 1999, filed recently (22nd February, 1999) on behalf of the employees. There is no reply by the employer to the said affidavit.

2. There is no order of the Court that permits an additional affidavit to be filed. It is stated by the learned advocate-on-record for the employees that, as a matter of practice, such affidavits are filed and the Registry accepts them.

3. The said affidavit is an affidavit in which facts are pleaded, additional to the facts placed before the High Court. No such affidavit could have been filed and taken on record without the express permission of the Court to file the affidavit and place additional material on record. The Registry is hereby directed to ensure that no affidavits are taken on record in pending appeals, especially if they set out facts, unless orders of the Court permit them to be filed. This order shall be treated as a practice direction to be complied with hereafter in all matters.

4. Adjourned for four weeks to enable the employer to file a reply to the said affidavit. To be treated as part-heard.

(C.R.)

***********

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top