SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(SC) 661

D.P.MOHAPATRA, R.C.LAHOTI, SUJATA V.MANOHAR
Umapati Choudhary – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


Judgment

D.P. Mohapatra, J.-These two cases are inter-linked with each other. Both the cases have been filed by the same person Shri Umapati Choud­hary. While Civil Appeal No. 336 of 1993 is directed against the judgment and order dated 17.12.1991 of the Patna High Court in C.W.J.C. No. 6054 of 1991, in Writ Petition (C) No. 667 of 1992 the petitioner has sought quashing of the orders dated 17.3.1992, 20.3.1992 and 21.3.1992 filed as Annexures 11, 12 and 13 respectively of the writ petition which appear to have been passed on the basis of the judgment dated 17.12.1991 in C.W.J.C. No. 6054 of 1991.

2. The controversy raised in the case relates to the question whether the appellant should be treated as a permanent employee of the Bihar Sanskrit Shiksha Board (for short ‘the Board’) or he was on deputa­tion to the Board from Kameshwar Singh Darbhanga Sanskrit University (for short ‘the University). The High Court having held that the appellant could not claim to be a permanent employee of the Board and his service as Controller of Examinations of the Board having been terminated on that basis, he has filed the two cases.

3. The factual matrix relevant for appreciating the controversy ma














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top