SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(SC) 666

V.N.KHARE, UMESH C.BANERJEE
Food Corporation Of India – Appellant
Versus
Sreekanth Transport – Respondent


Judgment

Banerjee, J.-These appeals by the grant of Special Leave pertains to the effect of the usual ‘excepted clause’ vis-a-vis the arbitration clause in a Government contract. While it is true and as has been contended, that the authorisation of the arbitrators to arbitrate, flows from the agreement but the High Court in the judgment impugned thought it fit to direct adjudication of ‘excepted matters’ in the agreement itself by the arbitrators and hence these appeals before this Court.

2. At the outset, it is pertinent to note that in the usual Governmental con­tracts, the reference to which would be made immediately hereafter, there is exclusion of some matters from the purview of arbitration and a senior officer of the Department usually is given the authority and power to adjudicate the same. The clause itself records that the decision of the senior officer, being the adjudicator, shall be final and binding between the parties-this is what popularly known as ‘excepted matters’ in a Government or Governmental agencies’ contract.

3. ‘Excepted matters’ obviously, as the parties agreed, do not require any further adjudication since the agreement itself provides a named adjudicator



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top